Key words: academic essay, essay question, paragraph, introduction, body, conclusion, reference list Sometimes a good example of what you are trying to achieve is worth a words of advice! When you are asked to write an essay, try to find some samples (models) of similar writing and learn to observe the craft of the writer Try leaving off the “In this essay, I will discuss ” element and just start with what you will discuss. Make it your thesis statement. See how that sounds, adjust it to be a complete statement. The reader will automatically know that it is the topic of your essay 11/12/ · This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers. Stylistic Analysis of Still I Rise by Maya Angelou
Stylistic Analysis of Still I Rise by Maya Angelou: [Essay Example], words GradesFixer
So far, I have really only offered cursory responses to this ubiquitous and problematic construct. It truly is the bane of academia. Whatever the case, the nuances of this construct are not adequately explained to undergrads. All that being said, I offer another alternative to this troublesome construct: the prepositional or contextual construct.
This sentence, in this essay i will, or couple of sentences, gives historical or localising information about the topic of the in this essay i will. Before further explanation, an example is useful:.
In Art as ExperienceJohn Dewey states that the goal of his aesthetic project is to reintegrate aesthetic experience with everyday experience. That is, it first points to the context of the argument, rather than diving straight in. The purpose of prepositional phrases, as I have discussed elsewhereis to locate, in either time or space, in this essay i will, the content of the sentence. It is important to note that the example does not constitute a thesis statement, the statement of the argument you intend to make.
This has the benefit in this essay i will eliminating large chunks of the text, in this essay i will. There are a number of options I can employ here. PreviouslyI have discussed the use of modal constructs as a useful alternative; it blends quite well with this prepositional alternative, at least in terms of the example:. It can be argued, then, following Dewey, that everyday experience can be experienced aesthetically. This line of argument needs refining.
It could be narrowed down to the everyday experience of conversation, even flirtation:. The act of flirtation, for instance, in this essay i will, can be aesthetic under certain conditions, particularly if the participants are oriented towards the act in the way that Dewey prescribes. Second, a more focused explication of how everyday and aesthetic experience overlap; and third a direct analysis of how flirtation can be aesthetic, rather than a means to an end. The introduction builds toward a testable thesis statement; importantly, it indicates a context through which the thesis statement can be understood and tested.
This prepositional in this essay i will can be employed in a wide variety of cases. However, as Simon Goldhill points out, sexual penetration was not an acceptable practice. Importantly, the second sentence provides a source, which helps support the claim of the first sentence. The two sentences of this example provide a framework, focusing on a time period, an issue, and a particular manifestation of, or exception to, that issue.
Christianity has been particularly influential in the change of sexual mores. Nevertheless, Christianised sexual ethics is by no in this essay i will free of unusual or problematic strictures or rules.
In Ancient Greece, it was not uncommon for adult males to take young boys as lovers. Regardless of such strictures, sexual relationships between men or women of different ages has generally been unacceptable.
Nevertheless, Christianity has been particularly influential in the change of sexual mores. Christianised sexual ethics is in this essay i will no means free of unusual or problematic strictures or rules. Ancient Greek and Christian sexual ethics can be compared and shown, on balance, to reflect erotic and political preferences, rather than any inherent moral sense. It is important to note that the constructs I have been discussing are n0t mutually exclusive; it is, in fact, possible, to effectively blend all three, in this essay i will.
There is no rule against first using a prepositional construct, a modal construct, then the self-reflexive construct to shape your introduction and your argument. This requires some practice, and learning to use the first two and avoiding the self-reflexive construct altogether will help you understand how to make an argument concisely.
Leave a comment. Filed under "In this essay I will argue Tagged as English GrammarEnglish Language Skillsenglish skillsenglish writing skillsessay skillsessay writingessay writing skillsGrammarIn this essay I willwriting skills, in this essay i will.
For the novice essayist it can be easy to lose sight in this essay i will what you are actually doing, what the key function of the essay actually is; this admittedly perfunctory construct at least puts us in the frame of mind to make an argument, to evaluate a text, to compare and contrast two or more or more texts.
The construct is always followed by the key verb, which is then followed by the point of focus, the text, the scene, to example, etc.
Most first year students are ready to begin moving away from this construct, at least in the editing phase. But the question arises: How? The first, and possibly most important point, thing to remember is that there is an element of modality expressed in this construct. Modality is an often overlooked aspect of argument. It refers to an argument as contingent in this essay i will merely possible.
First, it acknowledges that an argument is being made; second, it acknowledges that while there is an argument being made, there are also other arguments that could be made instead. The major difference is where the respective constructs occur in the introduction of your essay. There is nothing wrong with making an argument in the full knowledge that there are other arguments that could be made instead. Sometimes we use the explicit modal construct in conjunction with the more self-reflexive construct:.
In this essay I will argue that Frankenstein can be seen as a cautionary tale against the excesses of the scientific revolution. In particular, I will argue that Frankenstein demonstrates that science should be guided by the ethical values of society, and not simply the ambitions of scientists. Frankenstein can be seen as a cautionary tale against the excesses of the scientific revolution. Frankenstein demonstrates that science should be guided by the ethical values of society, in this essay i will, and not simply the ambitions of scientists.
All arguments have some shade of modality about them; the trick is identifying the modal propositions or components and determining and if and how that modality can be used to frame your argument. You are making an argument, not asserting an incontrovertible fact — something about your argument will be, well, arguable! Tagged as engish writing skillsEnglish GrammarEnglish Language Skillsessay skillsessay writingessay writing skillsGrammarlanguage skills.
There is no consensus on whether it is acceptable for undergraduate students to use a basic introductory phrase like this or not. There are valid arguments for both sides, but I think it is important to always bear in mind that, as emerging essay-writers, undergraduates are located somewhere on a continuum, or an arc of development.
The further along that in this essay i will one is, the stronger the argument is against the use of such a basic introductory phrase. A third-year undergraduate, for instance, should not need to use this and similar phrases, whereas with a first-year student it should be forgiven. A second-year student might continue to use phrases like this to begin his or her essay, but during the editing phase change it to something a little more stylish and inviting.
It is a question of transition, from the basic to the more complex, and some leeway should be provided for students to progress from one point to the next. This is, however, my personal opinion. Others are vehemently opposed to the use of these phrases, especially this one. There are a number of reasons, such as it being perfunctory or uninspired.
This objection has merit, but a distinction can be made to prevent the infection of subjectivity. Understanding this distinction is a useful lesson to learn as it helps to crystallise the whole rationale of essay writing. Simply put, with the objective use, the reader can judge objectively: did the write do what he or she said he or she would do?
The facts upon which such a judgement is to be based is present in the text, and can be verified or falsified by other readers. The facts upon which such a judgement is to be based is present in the reader. This is because the in this essay i will pronoun, like all pronouns, is a shape-shifter. Pronouns can shift their meaning.
More accurately, pronouns can shift the nouns they are substituting for without any warning or indication. It is a lateral step; a step to the side rather than a step forward.
Furthermore, there is an implicit acknowledgement in the use of this phrase that the author is, in fact, making an argument, or whatever the author has promised to do in the essay.
These five words are a shortcut right to the heart of the essay; in terms of the thought processes that are called upon to produce the essay, the author is cast into their midst already by their use.
Put another way, the author finds him or herself already in the midst of in this essay i will writing of an essay, the making of an argument, in this essay i will. This no doubt seems a strange, complex, way to think about such a perfunctory phrase.
But it is important to bear in mind two things. Secondly, more stylistic alternatives are often still beyond the grasp of undergraduate students; this is because of the lack of the conceptual framework that this phrase provides. Students who are not yet capable of a stylish introduction, but are forced to avoid this simple construct, often meander through their introduction without actually saying what is to be done in the body of the essay.
Often the wayward student falls back on commonplaces, clichés and adages, to get their essays started. For instance:. In ancient Greece, it was common for men to take young male lovers. Sexual activity between such homosexual couples was regulated by custom; it was, for instance, not acceptable to sexually penetrate a young boy. This is in stark contrast to modern sexual mores where such activity between older men and younger boys would be considered perverse.
There are religious and political differences between these historical periods that contribute greatly to this difference in sexual attitudes. The rise of Christianity and the subsequent social and political conservatism that emerged had an oppressive effect on the variety of sexual difference that is observable in the ancient Greek world.
This is not a bad introductory paragraph. What it lacks, however, is clear and concise direction. What the essay will be about is clear, in general; however, it does not specify what the essay will be arguing, or what material it will use. It does not explicitly indicate an argument.
In a longer piece of writing, say words long, the above introduction might work as a contextualising paragraph. The following introduction is less stylish, but clear and direct:. In this essay I will discuss the differences between ancient Greek and modern Western attitudes towards sexuality. In particular, I will focus on the difference between ancient and modern attitudes towards homosexuality. I will argue that, up until the latter part of the 20 th century, attitudes toward homosexuality in the West were influenced by Christianity and the social and political conservatism that emerged from Christian dogmatism over the last two thousand years.
Furthermore, I will argue that the modern social progressive movement, in this essay i will, of which homosexual acceptance is just one central tenet, is indicative of the weakening hold of Christianity in the West. In the second paragraph, I am, as the writer, aware of what I am doing in this essay: I will engage in a comparison between two historical periods; I will focus on a particular point of comparison; and I will make a number of arguments following from this particular point of comparison.
There is a logical progression of detail, from the general to the specific. As the introduction continues it becomes more and more obvious what will be discussed: the intention of the essay becomes clear.
Explaining Complexity in Reading \u0026 Writing - Live Review Session 7 - AP English Literature
, time: 49:4121 Of The Most Hilarious "In This Essay" Memes On Twitter
10/9/ · Hey all, another question. I've got an infuriating problem that my lecturer has not told me how to solve. Earlier in the year, I used the phrase "In this essay I will explore" and was told that is incorrect for academic use. But didn't actually say which part. Can anybody tell me which? I 11/12/ · This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers. Stylistic Analysis of Still I Rise by Maya Angelou Key words: academic essay, essay question, paragraph, introduction, body, conclusion, reference list Sometimes a good example of what you are trying to achieve is worth a words of advice! When you are asked to write an essay, try to find some samples (models) of similar writing and learn to observe the craft of the writer
No comments:
Post a Comment